The Cost of Spam – Viewer discretion is advised…

By Kevin Huxham, on May 19, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , ,

Here are the latest numbers released from the nice folks at Ferris Research on the projected cost of spam in 2009: $130,000,000,000.00 USD

Cough Cough… gasp, What??! (correct, that’s 130 billion… I thought I’d add the zeros in there for some added affect)

This is a 30% increase from 2007. Scary stuff! but still, I think a pretty conservative estimate. It was calculated from operational costs and productivity loss from people inspecting/deleting spam and also from searching/retrieving legitimate email (false positives) deleted in error by spam filters. It seems a little hard to believe seeing all that has been done in the last 4 years to combat spam, but I guess it’s time to step it up.

Here are some more interesting statistics:

• # non-spam emails sent during 2006 by business email users: 6 trillion
• Estimated number of non-spam email messages sent worldwide each day 2006: 25 billion
• % of email messages sent daily that are spam messages: > 75%
• Typical # Internet emails sent and received by a business user: 600 per week
• Cost of a user deleting a spam message: $0.04
• Cost of a user retrieving a bona fide message erroneously deleted as spam (“false positive”): $3.50

This last one through me… no spam filter is perfect, there will always be legitimate mail that gets blocked, but I would be interested in knowing what percentage of this 130 bil is spent looking for false positives? Ferris, please don’t make us wait another 4 years. Keep up the good work!

Read the whole summary from Ferris Research

Want to calculate your own company’s cost of spam? Barracuda has a nifty Spam Cost Calculator

Bye for now,

Kevin

CakeMail’s new Website is Online

By Francois Lane, on May 11, 2009 - 2 Comments
Tag(s): , ,

We’ve redesigned our website in order to make it easier to find information about CakeMail and email marketing. More pages and resources will be added in the coming weeks. So stay tuned!

It would be great to have your comments!

new_cakemailcom

CAN-SPAM vs. Bill C-27: Canada more severe

By Isabel Lapointe, on May 8, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , ,

Marketing Sherpa’s team compare the American anti-spam law and the Canadian anti-spam project of law to highlight the five major differences. We could say that Canadian anti-spam law goes a little further.

Difference #1. Advanced permission is required
Difference #2. Permission is required for SMS messages
Difference #3. Unsubscribe links must stay active for 60 days
Difference #4. Unsubscribe requests must be honored within 10 days
Difference #5. Individuals have the right to sue spammers

Read the complete article: Canada’s Anti-Spam Bill: 5 Key Differences from CAN SPAM

Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 3: List Cleaning 101 and Hardbounces

By Kevin Huxham, on May 4, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , ,

Previous posts:
Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 1: The Risks
Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 2: Prepare your Re-Opt in Email

Hi again, in my last post we talked a bit about reviving old lists and dealing with hardbounces, but I never really got into how important they are. Sure, most people know what a hardbounce is, but I don’t think many people know what kind of an impact sending to them can have on your deliverability.

Very simply a hardbounce is a bounce generated when you send an email to an address that does not exist. It may have existed in the past, but not anymore. Just like calling a phone number that’s been disconnected, you usually get a recording saying “This number is no longer in service..” – which is effectively the same thing. The big difference is, the phone company doesn’t block the rest of your outbound phone calls because you dialed too many wrong numbers!

ISPs look very closely at the number of hardbounces a sender generates. Too many from a given network can indicate a potential Directory Harvest Attack and ISPs will put up a block (usually done automatically) to prevent slow downs which may cause further harm to their users. Have you ever sent an email to a friend and wondered why it took so long to get there? Think about it, if an ISP is being bombarded by millions of spammers trying to validate a list of a ‘gagillion’ addresses, it’s going to slow down the legitimate email from getting through and people will inevitably start complaining.

In order to prevent these blocks, it’s very important to keep your list(s) up-to-date. This means sending on a regular basis and removing hardbounces as you go. CakeMail automatically does this for you, but if you haven’t used the list in a while or like we talked about last week, you’re thinking of using an older list, you need to be very careful. As a preventative measure, which we’ve also mentioned several times, you should be confirming any new leads. When somebody signs-up, you should (at the very least) be sending that address a Welcome email. Not only will this prove they have access to the address, but it will get rid of hardbounces right away and prevent you sending a whole bunch at once. It also gives you an excellent opportunity to send them your From address for Whitelisting and thank them for signing up in the first place!

Bye for now,

Kevin

If you have any questions, Kevin can be reached at: postmaster@cakemail.com or feel free to use our Help Desk.

10 Email Marketing Resolutions to Improve your Life

By Isabel Lapointe, on May 1, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): ,

Note: this blogpost was originally published on January 5 2009.

We know you’ve already planned to lose weight, quit smoking, and start exercising to improve your quality of life. And we don’t want to overwhelm you with MORE resolutions but simply having better email marketing practices can diminish your complaint rate and improve your deliverability, lowering your stress level and making your life in general better! Aren’t we thoughtful? ;-)

  1. Emails are nothing without the appropriate permissions. Go for double opt-in.
  2. Should we really tell you once more to NOT buy lists?
  3. Keep your lists as up-to-date as possible. Delete all problem addresses and react quickly to unsubscribe requests.
  4. Avoid using lists you haven’t used for more than a year. If you’ve stopped using a list for several months, it’s a good idea to send a request to subscribers, reconfirming their subscription prior to any other sending.
  5. In the subscription process clearly explain what your users will receive and when. And allow your subscribers to unsubscribe easily.
  6. Email subjects must be as clear as possible. Don’t take the chance of getting mixed up with spam. And picking an attractive subject line will make your readers eager to open your email.
  7. In your emails have a clear sender name and address, and always use the same ones.
  8. Ask your subscribers to add your email address to their contact list so you won’t end up in their spam box.
  9. Respect your users and the rules you agreed to when they subscribed to your email. Go further than the rules set up by the CAN-SPAM Act, or at least respect them.
  10. Make good content! No one will complaint about receiving interesting content.

Whitelisting 101 on CakeMail and the Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group – MAAWG Senders Communications Practices Guide (PDF download) will help you keep your resolutions.

Have a great, successful and healthy year in 2009!

Anti-Spam Law for Canada (Bill C-27/Projet de loi C-27)

By Isabel Lapointe, on May 1, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , , , , ,

Canada has now announced it’s own legislation project to protect citizens from Spam. The Electronic Commerce Protection Act, or Bill C-27 has been announced with possible penalties of up to $10 million for spammers. A few months after the launch of the National Do Not Call List to rule the telemarketers operations, the Anti-Spam Law wants to rule the legitimate world of canadian email marketing.

But as we all know, unfortunately not solving all the problems of Spam, mostly created by illegitimate practices.

Here is the Electronic Commerce Protection Act – Bill C-27

En Français, Projet de loi C-27

Michael Geist on Bill C-27

Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 2: Prepare your Re-Opt in Email

By Kevin Huxham, on May 1, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , ,

Previous post: Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 1: The Risks

Here’s some good advice when preparing your re-opt in email:

  • As with any email, make sure to have the clearest “FROM” possible so they can always identify you
  • Be sure your “OBJECT”/”SUBJECT” is clear and doesn’t look like spam
  • Reconfirmation emails should not contain advertising content of any kind
  • Tell them precisely how you got their email address, so they understand they had previously subscribed
  • Give them precise information about the type of content you will send them and the frequency of mailings they will receive. Informing you subscribers is also a good idea when you make any changes to the type of content or frequency of your mailings, or to your company name, website, logo, etc.
  • Be able to fulfill your promises before you ask people to subscribe
  • Make them want to sign up! Create emails that are as ‘attractive’ as possible to get them interested in subscribing
  • Be clear that you are updating your list, and that they will need to “Subscribe to your newsletter” by clicking on a link. If they don’t do this, they won’t receive anything from you.
  • Add some links to your Privacy and Anti-Spam policiess
  • Give yourself some time to receive your subscriptions. You can add the date of the first mailing in the email so they know how much time they have to register if they want to receive it. Late responses will be subscribed to future mailings
  • Don’t be discouraged if you don’t receive much feedback from your users. It’s a good idea to couple your move with a ‘subscription campaign’ on your website to reinforce the interest in subscribing;
  • Discuss this process with your ISP. We at CakeMail will help you plan your mailing and also discuss with ISPs to ensure you won’t have any problems

If you have any questions, Kevin can be reached at: postmaster@cakemail.com or feel free to use our Help Desk.

Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 1: The Risks

By Kevin Huxham, on May 1, 2009 - Leave a comment
Tag(s): , ,

Nowadays people are really trying to get the most out of their email campaigns. This sometimes means going back and using lists you haven’t touched in a while. This can often do more harm than good, so watch out!

Let’s say you haven’t sent any email to your subscribers for a while – about 6 months – and you have now decided to start a weekly newsletter in order to share your coveted knowledge, making your subscribers very happy. You prepare it carefully and send a few tests. Then suddenly you think: “Wait, maybe it would be a good idea to (re)confirm their permission first”. Phew!

This is actually the best move you could make. Sending content to subscribers who haven’t received anything from you in over 6 months is the best way to get into some serious deliverability problems. Chances are they won’t remember ever signing up and hit the ’Spam’ button before you even have a chance to communicate with them. The next thing you know, even people who signed up yesterday aren’t getting your email, or the email is ending up in their Junk folder.

Using old lists increases the risk of you sending to Spamtraps and getting your Domain and/or IP blacklisted. After email addresses have been deactivated for a while, ISPs sometimes use them as bait to catch people using old lists. If you had been sending to this list regularly, these traps would have hardbounced a long time ago and would no longer be on your list. The best way to regain contact with those on older lists is to send a message asking for permission to contact them again and have them re-opt in to your list. Of course, using 6months as a general timeline is a good place to start – the older the list, the bigger the risk that your subscribers won’t remember having subscribed. It’s important to understand that the further you go back, the more likely you are to run into trouble. Realistically, if you haven’t contacted these people at all in the last year, they should no longer be considered part of your list.

If you have any questions, Kevin can be reached at: postmaster@cakemail.com or feel free to use our Help Desk.

Next time: Thinking of Using an ‘Old’ List? – Part 2: Prepare your Re-Opt in Email